Financial Fraud Law
![]() |
Fraud Law Reports In-depth legal analysis of fraud issues by some of the country’s leading attorneys. Subscribe Now and receive 10 print, journal format reports (with online access) a year. Each issue contains 10 reports. |

Fraud Law Resources
Articles on fraud-related topics, plus other resources. Subscribe for full access!
Law Blog
Stay on top of breaking news with legal analysis and commentary. Post your comments!
Most Read
- Longer Prison Sentences Coming For Financial Fraud? (203)
- Oldest Swiss Bank Indicted on U.S. Tax Charges (171)
- Execs To Prison In Case Featuring Second Largest Antitrust Criminal Fine Ever (106)
- Another (!) Leading Law Firm Jumps Into White Collar Defense With Big Hires (96)
- Wave Of Law Firm Moves Involving Financial Fraud Lawyers Continues Unabated (90)
Section 956 of the Dodd-Frank law prohibits incentive-based compensation arrangements that encourage inappropriate risk taking by covered financial institutions and are deemed to be excessive, or that may lead to material losses. Today, the FDIC approved a joint proposed rulemaking to implement Section 956.
Earlier this morning, we noted that a story in the New York Times today says that the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission that Congress created to look into the financial meltdown is wrestling with “setbacks.” Now, we see that the Washington Post says that the SEC is facing “setbacks” (along with skepticism) in its efforts to change its enforcement image.
Walter Moeling, a banking law expert and head of the Financial Institutions practice at the international law firm Bryan Cave LLP, has some thoughts that we think are of great interest on the Senate Banking Bill being considered today:
Good Friday morning, all. There are a lot of lawyers (and bloggers, such as yours truly!) following the federal government’s response to the economic and financial industry problems we have been facing for a year.
The group known as "Americans for Financial Reform" is right out of the gate with a statement on the passage by the House Financial Services Committee earlier today of a bill providing for a Consumer Financial Protection Agency. Opponents undoubtedly will be criticizing the bill, but here’s what AFR’s director, Heather Booth, says:
It may very well happen. “It” is financial regulatory reform, and today the House Financial Services Committee passed H.R. 3126, the Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act of 2009. As the Wall Street Journal reports, the vote was largely along party lines – but the party that voted in favor has majorities in both the House and Senate.
“Dark pools” of liquidity are a type of private, alternative trading system (“ATS”) in which participants can transact their trades without displaying quotations to the public. When investors place an order to buy or sell on an exchange, the exchange typically makes that order available for the public to view. With some dark pools, however, investors are able to signal that they have an interest in either buying or selling a security.


