Financial Fraud Law
![]() |
Fraud Law Reports In-depth legal analysis of fraud issues by some of the country’s leading attorneys. Subscribe Now and receive 10 print, journal format reports (with online access) a year. Each issue contains 10 reports. |

Fraud Law Resources
Articles on fraud-related topics, plus other resources. Subscribe for full access!
Law Blog
Stay on top of breaking news with legal analysis and commentary. Post your comments!
Most Read
- MERS Responds to Some of Schneiderman’s Claims (364)
- Oldest Swiss Bank Indicted on U.S. Tax Charges (218)
- BREAKING: Schneiderman Sues Major Banks For ‘Deceptive & Fraudulent Use’ Of MERS (136)
- Bank President Criminally Responsible For Fraud That ‘Contributed To Financial Crisis’ (121)
- Timeshare Marketing Scams Increasing Nationwide (105)
Late last week, while the Securities and Exchange Commission was getting ready to go after Goldman, it released a report by the SEC Office of the Inspector General that was highly critical of the SEC's actions in connection with R. Allen Stanford's alleged Ponzi scheme – a report highly reminiscent of the criticisms the SEC faced following its failure to find the Madoff fraud on a timely basis.
The Office of Inspector General (OIG) is an independent office within the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that conducts audits of programs and operations of the Commission and investigations into allegations of misconduct by staff or contractors. The mission of the OIG is to detect fraud, waste and abuse, and to promote integrity, economy, efficiency and effectiveness, in the Commission’s programs and operations.
The SEC made the OIG report public last evening. All 477 pages (the table of contents alone is 19 pages) are avaialble at
The summary of the OIG report released today by the SEC concludes with this damning paragraph:


